How does this skill improve AI agent performance?

By using deterministic keywords, the AI knows exactly which steps are non-negotiable (MUST) and which are optional (MAY), leading to more predictable and reliable execution of tasks.

Can I use this for security and compliance documentation?

Yes, it is highly effective for security protocols where 'MUST NOT' constraints are critical to prevent data leaks, unauthorized access, or compliance violations.

What is RFC 2119 and why is it used here?

RFC 2119 is a technical standard that defines specific keywords like MUST, SHOULD, and MAY to indicate requirement levels. Using it in SOPs ensures that instructions are unambiguous for both human developers and AI agents.

What is the difference between SHOULD and MUST in this context?

MUST indicates an absolute requirement that causes failure if skipped, while SHOULD indicates a strong recommendation or best practice where valid exceptions might exist.

RFC 2119 SOP Standards

Name: RFC 2119 SOP Standards
Author: TheBushidoCollective

byTheBushidoCollective

•

Learning & Documentation

Standardizes SOP writing using RFC 2119 constraint keywords to ensure deterministic AI agent behavior and clear requirements.

About

This skill integrates the IETF's RFC 2119 requirement levels into your Standard Operating Procedures, providing a framework for precise instruction. By utilizing specific keywords like MUST, SHOULD, and MAY, it eliminates ambiguity in documentation, allowing AI agents to distinguish between mandatory constraints and optional recommendations. This is especially critical for teams building complex workflows, security protocols, and deployment checklists where predictable execution and rigorous adherence to standards are essential for system integrity.

Key Features

Reduces ambiguity in complex technical documentation and SOPs
Ensures deterministic AI agent behavior through precise constraints
Provides specific patterns for security, deployment, and TDD workflows
Identifies and corrects vague or conflicting requirement language
Implements RFC 2119 requirement levels (MUST, SHOULD, MAY)
39 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Standardizing internal team documentation for consistent project execution
Drafting high-stakes deployment checklists with mandatory safety steps
Creating automated code review guidelines that agents can strictly follow

About

Key Features

Reduces ambiguity in complex technical documentation and SOPs
Ensures deterministic AI agent behavior through precise constraints
Provides specific patterns for security, deployment, and TDD workflows
Identifies and corrects vague or conflicting requirement language
Implements RFC 2119 requirement levels (MUST, SHOULD, MAY)
39 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Standardizing internal team documentation for consistent project execution
Drafting high-stakes deployment checklists with mandatory safety steps
Creating automated code review guidelines that agents can strictly follow