Scholar Evaluation (Scientific Thinking)

•
215k
•

Evaluates academic papers, research proposals, and literature reviews using a structured, reproducible scientific rubric.

The Scholar Evaluation skill provides a rigorous framework for assessing the quality, validity, and impact of scientific and academic works within Claude Code. It enables users to perform standardized reviews of manuscripts across nine critical dimensions, including methodology, evidence quality, and citation support. By identifying structural gaps and verifying that claims are backed by cited evidence, this skill helps researchers, students, and technical writers produce high-quality, publication-ready documents with actionable feedback for improvement.

Key Features

01Identification of validity threats and specific revision priorities
02214,597 GitHub stars
03Rigorous methodology and research design analysis
04Standardized markdown output templates for formal review reporting
05Evidence-based citation audit to verify support for major claims
06Structured 9-dimension scoring rubric (1-5 scale) for objective assessment

Use Cases

01Evaluating the methodological rigor and data quality of a research proposal
02Performing a peer-review style audit of a research paper or technical manuscript
03Providing structured feedback for thesis chapters or literature reviews