About
Scientific Critical Thinking provides a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor by analyzing methodology, experimental design, and evidence quality. It leverages established frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias to assess the strength of conclusions while identifying potential sources of bias, such as p-hacking or selection errors. This skill is indispensable for peer reviewers, researchers, and students who need to perform deep-dive critiques of scientific literature, ensure statistical conclusion validity, and identify logical fallacies in complex scientific arguments.