SOSP Peer Review Process Guide
Models the ACM SOSP double-blind peer review pipeline and guides post-review triage, author responses, and meeting preparation.
Demystifies the rigorous evaluation lifecycle of ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP) submissions, tracking your paper from HotCRP abstract registration and conflict screening through staged review rounds to the single-track Program Committee (PC) meeting. It helps computer systems researchers triage reviewer feedback, distinguish score-driving soundness attacks from subjective taste judgments, arm paper champions for live PC debates, and strictly adhere to double-blind integrity standards throughout the decision cycle.
Key Features
01Identifies single-track PC meeting risks and arms paper advocates with concise counterarguments
02Models the end-to-end SOSP peer review pipeline across all stages from submission to shepherding
03Enforces double-blind review integrity and official HotCRP communication protocols
041,090 GitHub stars
05Structures post-review triage to categorize soundness attacks, positioning gaps, and taste judgments
06Evaluates author response eligibility to focus rebuttals on factual errors and core objections
Use Cases
01Maintaining double-blind compliance and conflict-of-interest etiquette during the conference submission cycle
02Analyzing reviewer scores and feedback patterns to decide between rebuttal focus or next-deadline retargeting
03Triaging early SOSP reviews and formulating strategic author response arguments for the PC meeting