What is behavior-focused testing in this skill?

Behavior-focused testing ensures you are testing the outcomes and logic (e.g., status codes or returned data) rather than internal implementation details like whether a specific library function was called.

What happens if my code doesn't meet the 80% coverage threshold?

The skill will automatically mark the task status as NEEDS_FIX and append specific notes detailing the coverage gaps that need to be addressed before the task can be completed.

Which edge cases does the skill specifically look for?

It identifies gaps in coverage for empty or null inputs, boundary values, error handling scenarios, race conditions, and basic security vulnerabilities.

Can this skill distinguish between different test types?

Yes, it categorizes tests into Unit (pure functions), Integration (DB/API interactions), and E2E (critical workflows) for a comprehensive breakdown in the final report.

Test Quality & Coverage Validator

Name: Test Quality & Coverage Validator
Author: dhruvbaldawa

bydhruvbaldawa

•

Security & Testing

Ensures high-quality codebases by validating test behavior, identifying edge case gaps, and enforcing strict coverage standards.

About

The Test Quality & Coverage Validator is a specialized Claude Code skill designed to automate the rigorous evaluation of software tests. It guides the AI to shift focus from implementation-specific tests to behavior-focused validation, ensuring that code handles real-world scenarios like null inputs, boundary conditions, and race conditions. By enforcing a minimum threshold of 80% statement coverage and 75% branch coverage, this skill helps developers maintain robust applications while providing structured reporting and task status management directly within project planning files.

Key Features

Strict coverage enforcement (>80% statements, >75% branches)
Detailed automated testing notes including unit/integration/E2E breakdown
Behavior-focused test validation to prevent brittle implementation-based tests
Structured status reporting with READY_FOR_REVIEW and NEEDS_FIX workflows
3 GitHub stars
Automated gap analysis for edge cases like null/empty inputs and race conditions

Use Cases

Standardizing testing reports and documentation within a team's task management workflow
Auditing legacy test suites to identify missing boundary and error-handling cases
Verifying new feature implementations meet quality standards before code review

About

Key Features

Strict coverage enforcement (>80% statements, >75% branches)
Detailed automated testing notes including unit/integration/E2E breakdown
Behavior-focused test validation to prevent brittle implementation-based tests
Structured status reporting with READY_FOR_REVIEW and NEEDS_FIX workflows
3 GitHub stars
Automated gap analysis for edge cases like null/empty inputs and race conditions

Use Cases

Standardizing testing reports and documentation within a team's task management workflow
Auditing legacy test suites to identify missing boundary and error-handling cases
Verifying new feature implementations meet quality standards before code review