Content Evaluation Framework FAQs

Question 1

What does the Content Evaluation Framework skill do?

Accepted Answer

This skill provides a systematic, weighted rubric for evaluating educational content such as book chapters and lessons. It analyzes materials across six categories—Technical Accuracy, Pedagogical Effectiveness, Writing Quality, Structure, AI-First Teaching, and Constitutional Compliance—to ensure high-quality learning outcomes.

Question 2

What are the assessment tiers for content quality?

Accepted Answer

The skill categorizes content into four tiers: Excellent (90-100%) for exemplary work, Good (75-89%) for publication-ready material, Needs Work (50-74%) for content requiring significant revision, and Insufficient (<50%) for content needing a major rewrite.

Question 3

How does the weighted scoring system work?

Accepted Answer

The framework calculates a final score based on specific weights: Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogy (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure (15%), and AI-First Teaching (10%). Additionally, content must pass a mandatory 'Constitution Compliance' gate to be considered valid, regardless of its numeric score.

Question 4

How does this skill improve my documentation workflow?

Accepted Answer

It removes subjectivity from the review process by providing evidence-based reports. By automating the evaluation of technical correctness and pedagogical flow, it helps authors identify specific areas for improvement with actionable recommendations and line-by-line feedback.

Question 5

When should I use this Claude Code skill?

Accepted Answer

You should invoke this framework at multiple stages: during iterative drafting to catch early issues, after completing a lesson for a full audit, or as a final quality gate before moving content into a production or validation phase.

Content Evaluation Framework

Content Evaluation Framework

关于

主要功能

使用场景

关于

主要功能

使用场景