What inputs are required for the rubric-writer skill?

The skill requires output/CLAIMS.md and output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md to ensure the resulting review is grounded in specific evidence rather than vague impressions.

How does the 'actionable feedback' feature work?

For every major concern, the skill follows a specific structure: identifying the problem, explaining why it matters for the paper's validity, and proposing a minimal fix.

Can this skill help with reproducibility checks?

Yes, it includes a dedicated Reproducibility Auditor role that flags missing protocol details, baselines, and underspecified quantitative claims that block replication.

Does it support specific conference or journal formats?

Yes, if a DECISIONS.md file is present containing specific reviewer constraints or formatting rules, the skill will prioritize those requirements in the output.

Rubric Review Writer

Name: Rubric Review Writer
Author: WILLOSCAR

byWILLOSCAR

•

协作工具

Generates structured, evidence-grounded peer review reports and referee feedback based on extracted research claims and evidence gaps.

关于

The Rubric Review Writer is a specialized skill designed for the final stage of research evaluation pipelines. It transforms structured artifacts like extracted claims and missing evidence lists into a comprehensive, professional referee report (REVIEW.md). By adopting dual roles as a sharp academic referee and a reproducibility auditor, the skill ensures that feedback is never generic, but instead provides actionable 'problem-impact-fix' guidance across dimensions of novelty, soundness, clarity, and impact.

主要功能

Evaluates novelty, soundness, clarity, and impact systematically
96 GitHub stars
Generates evidence-backed referee reports grounded in CLAIMS.md and MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
Identifies missing protocol details and reproducibility blockers as an Auditor
Provides actionable feedback using a structured 'problem -> why it matters -> minimal fix' template
Supports custom reviewer constraints and formats via DECISIONS.md integration

使用场景

Conducting internal reproducibility audits and quality checks for research papers
Drafting formal peer review reports for academic journals or conferences
Providing structured, non-generic feedback to authors during pre-submission cycles

关于

主要功能

Evaluates novelty, soundness, clarity, and impact systematically
96 GitHub stars
Generates evidence-backed referee reports grounded in CLAIMS.md and MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
Identifies missing protocol details and reproducibility blockers as an Auditor
Provides actionable feedback using a structured 'problem -> why it matters -> minimal fix' template
Supports custom reviewer constraints and formats via DECISIONS.md integration

使用场景

Conducting internal reproducibility audits and quality checks for research papers
Drafting formal peer review reports for academic journals or conferences
Providing structured, non-generic feedback to authors during pre-submission cycles