How does it help structure a review report?

It provides a hierarchical structure that organizes feedback into a summary statement, major comments (critical flaws), and minor comments (clarity and presentation issues) for actionable author guidance.

Can it detect image manipulation or data fraud?

While it provides a framework for figure integrity and ethical checks, it acts as a guide for the reviewer to identify red flags like duplication or selective reporting rather than automated forensic detection.

What scientific disciplines does this skill support?

The toolkit is designed to be cross-disciplinary, applying universal principles of scientific rigor, statistical validity, and ethical standards applicable to STEM, social sciences, and humanities.

Does it follow standard reporting guidelines?

Yes, it specifically checks for compliance with major standards including CONSORT for clinical trials, STROBE for observational studies, and PRISMA for systematic reviews.

Scientific Peer Review Toolkit

Name: Scientific Peer Review Toolkit
Author: Zehong-Wang

byZehong-Wang

0•

学习与文档

Evaluates scientific manuscripts and grant proposals through a systematic assessment of methodology, statistics, and reproducibility.

The Scientific Peer Review skill provides a rigorous framework for critically evaluating research across all academic disciplines. It guides Claude through a comprehensive seven-stage workflow that covers initial assessment, section-by-section deep dives, statistical rigor, and ethical compliance. By implementing standardized reporting guidelines like CONSORT and PRISMA, this skill helps researchers and reviewers identify methodological flaws, assess data integrity, and generate constructive, high-quality feedback for manuscripts and grant applications.

主要功能

010 GitHub stars

02Reproducibility and transparency checks against international reporting standards

03Multi-stage systematic review workflow for rigorous manuscript evaluation

04Comprehensive ethical consideration and research integrity auditing

05Detailed assessment of methodological design and statistical validity

06Structured report generation with prioritized major and minor critiques

使用场景

01Pre-submission internal review of grant proposals and research protocols

02Evaluating the statistical and methodological rigor of published literature

03Generating formal peer review reports for academic journals and publishers

主要功能

010 GitHub stars

02Reproducibility and transparency checks against international reporting standards

03Multi-stage systematic review workflow for rigorous manuscript evaluation

04Comprehensive ethical consideration and research integrity auditing

05Detailed assessment of methodological design and statistical validity

06Structured report generation with prioritized major and minor critiques

使用场景

01Pre-submission internal review of grant proposals and research protocols

02Evaluating the statistical and methodological rigor of published literature

03Generating formal peer review reports for academic journals and publishers