Wolf Governance Framework FAQs

Question 1

Does this skill prevent self-approvals on pull requests?

Accepted Answer

Yes, the framework enforces a strict separation of concerns where implementers cannot merge their own PRs or grant exceptions to quality gates.

Question 2

Can this skill be used for security-critical development?

Accepted Answer

Absolutely. It includes a specific security-hardener archetype that mandates threat models, penetration testing results, and defense-in-depth validation before merging.

Question 3

What is the purpose of the mandatory journaling requirement?

Accepted Answer

Journals are required for all work to track problems encountered, decisions made, and learnings captured, ensuring that every development phase contributes to the project's knowledge base.

Question 4

What are the quality gates in Wolf Governance?

Accepted Answer

It uses a two-tier system: the Fast-Lane for rapid iteration (linting, unit tests) and the Full-Suite for production readiness validation (E2E tests, security scans, and performance benchmarks).

Question 5

How does it handle architectural changes?

Accepted Answer

Significant changes require the creation of an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) which documents the context, decision, and consequences, requiring approval from designated authority roles.

Wolf Governance Framework

主要功能

使用场景

Wolf Governance Framework

主要功能

使用场景